Virginia Senate leaves you vulnerable to crushing lawsuits for shooting an intruder

It’s late at night and you are awakened by the sound of your sliding glass door breaking. Your spouse is awake alongside of you and the frightened cries of your child are starting to rise in the next room. Amid that noise and over the sound of your own pounding heart, you hear the sounds of at least 2 intruders starting to come up the stairs at a pretty good pace. You reach for the firearm you’ve bought for just this kind of situation and, relying on the training you’ve put yourself through, you brace to protect yourself and your family from people who clearly intend to do you harm.

Shoot those intruders and either they or their families could sue you for the injury or death you inflict. That’s right – they can sue you for protecting your family, for holding your ground in your own home against criminals who cheerfully break the law. Ah, but they won’t win, you say. No jury would convict you for acting in self-defense and in defense of your family in such a situation, you say. You might even be right. Care to consider the 2-5 years of your life wrapped up in legal fees, trial dates, depositions by plaintiff lawyers calling your judgment into question, launching reputation-smearing campaigns in the press, the possibility of attracting the attention of “minority rights” and “immigrant rights” groups should the criminals you shot be of a particular ethnic persuasion?

Not pretty, is it?

If you live in Florida and the above scenario plays out, you can shoot and kill the attackers and no one can sue you for so much as a dime. That’s because a law was passed recently that gives the presumption of law to the legal resident of a home to use whatever force you reasonably consider necessary to defend yourself, your family, and your home.

Might have been nice if the Virginia Senate’s “Courts of Justice” Committee had seen fit to grant citizens of Virginia the same protections.

For the 3rd time running these… “worthies”… have declined to send such a law to the floor of the Senate for a vote. The bill, passed by the House by a margin of 80-19, was killed by this Senate committee because the Senators, “said they knew of no civil lawsuits or criminal prosecutions dealing with the use of deadly force against intruders, so they felt there was no need for the legislation.” How nice. Where is the rule written that laws can’t get passed protecting law-abiding citizens from lawsuit harassment until one of them actually gets harassed? Which Virginia citizen are they going to subject to this kind of abuse before they act to explicitly protect all Virginians from the threat? And, once that happens, can they then be trusted to act swiftly and provide retroactive cover to that citizen, or is that poor guy just out of luck?

To Senators Cuccinelli (R-37), Obenshain (R-26), McDougle (R-4), and Hurt (R-19) I offer my thanks. They were the 4 Senators willing to do right by Virginians and tried to keep the bill from being killed off. Well done, Senators.

To Senators Marsh (D-16), Saslaw (D-35), Stolle (R-8), Quayle, (R-13), Norment (R-3), Howell (D-32), Lucas (D-18), Edwards (D-21), Reynolds (D-20), Puller (D-36), and Deeds (D-25), I have nothing but contempt. These do-nothing, visionless idiots don’t deserve the chairs they’re seated in. My special disgust is saved for the 3 Republicans on this committee who have shown such a callous disregard for the citizens who trusted them to serve with honor and with an eye toward protecting their rights. This bill was such a no-brainer it should have taken all of 5 seconds for them to have done whatever they could to get it passed. But they clearly have more important things to do and to hell with any of their constituents that might get caught up in this kind of legal labyrinth. I would like to think that the RPV will hold them accountable for this and certainly not let them off the hook in explaining what the hell they were thinking. I have no such faith, however. Perhaps this will be something the citizens of Districts 3, 8, and 13 will remember the next time they step to the polls.

About these ads

8 thoughts on “Virginia Senate leaves you vulnerable to crushing lawsuits for shooting an intruder

  1. 10 feet tall and Bulletproof says:

    What happens if you never call the police, and the bodies are never recovered??

  2. Myk says:

    Dear Senators Marsh, Saslaw, Stolle, Quayle, Norment, Howell, Lucas, Edwards, Reynolds, Puller, and Deeds

    I just wanted to voice my displeasure at the fact that yet again certain people (I.E.you!!!) have voted to keep law abiding VA citizens at risk of civil litigation should they be forced into an undesireable situation where they may have to utilize lethal force against an unlawfull assailant who posses a lethal threat towards an innocent.

    I am glad that these “elected political heros” have decided to further protect the rights of criminals and their next of kin all across the commonwealth to sue a law abiding citizen after said citizen has been forced by the criminal to lawfully utilize lethal force against the criminal in order to lawfully defend themselves.

    Senator Deeds….I am especially disapointed in you.

    DICK Saslaw……I fully expected such from the likes of you and your ilk.

  3. Tim says:

    Dear Senators,

    As I help to protect this wonderful country of ours, please be like minded and help law abiding citizens such as myself to protect our homes and loved ones from un-invited intruders/terrorists.

    Thank you in advance for your support

  4. MantaRay says:

    Without ANY restrictions, it would be waaaaaay too easy to kill someone who might have come to your door by mistake.

    A few years back, an exchange student, who had been invited to a Halloween party, went to the wrong house. Guess what? The triggerhappy homeowner killed the young man. Didn’t bother to ask any questions, evidently.

    There MUST be restraints in the law.

  5. Derrick says:

    I propose a restriction. The homeowner must announce clearly that the other is trespassing and should they hesitate to retreat, they will use deadly force to deter the intruder. Is that too restrictive?

  6. charles reloadergriz says:

    This is a very simple answer – just let the nay sayers re this 2nd amendment right have “their” homes broken into, have their wives or daughters raped and killed in front of them, while they stand by and throw pillows at the intruders – they would pass this very necessary legislation very rapidly ! ! – there are idiot driver’s who are drunk ,
    but does mean the rest of us who have never received a ticket be punished for their deeds ? – I THINK NOT !

Comments are closed.